|
|
BOOKS |
|
Lost for Words (or a Word)
|
In English there does
not appear to be a generic word for village, town
and city. In fact, this very question was posted on the
internet and the conclusion was reached that there is no
such a word, although some were suggested such as community, settlement
and a number of others. However, it was generally felt that
these words had other connotations, so none was generally found
to be satisfactory. It was felt furthermore that what might be
found suitable in Britain would not be so in the USA, Australia
and other English speaking countries. I suspect too that a
suitable word in England may not be suitable in Scotland.
The RCHM divides Britain into counties, the counties
into hundreds (an long obsolete term) and the hundreds
into parishes. That last word is probably the most
satisfactory for our purpose here. I am aware there are
ecclesiastical parishes and civil parishes and their boundaries
do not always - as you might expect - correspond. But - as Mr.
Holmes would say: 'when you eliminated the totally
unsatisfactory, whatever remains, even if not quite ideal, must
be the word' |
|
|
Books are essential when compiling a
gazetteer such as this: first the monuments need to be found and then,
especially as I am no expert in the subject but rather an amateur
dabbler, information about them must then be gathered. However, first of
all the books themselves must be found. There are basically two types of
source books: one being books solely about church monuments and the
other being books about other subjects - such as architecture - which
have reasonable - and sometimes detailed - information about monuments. There is now the internet
too: however there are many errors on the internet and it is difficult to
discover which entries are accurate and which are not. However the internet is
particularly useful for being able to access books and papers which
are difficult or impossible to obtain, and especially those we might
initially have been unaware of. The Victoria County Histories are
now available on line as are the Royal Commission on Historical
Monuments, about which more later. These statements seem to say
that books are accurate while the internet is not: this is to some
extent true as anyone can write anything they wish on the internet whereas
books are proof read, edited and generally combed through before they are
published. This latter statement is also not strictly correct or there
would not be so many errors in the Pevsner series, about which
more later.
This list is far from complete as I have neglected a lot
of the more recent books although most of the earlier book have been
included. I may add these later given the book and the time. |
A Note of
Caution |
Many of these books are old - some very much so - and the information in
them often needs to be revised in the light of modern research.
But we do have to tread carefully here as this subject is not a
rigorous scientific one. Many revisions are the result of very
careful research and sound reasoning while many are not:
sometimes a whole complex theory is built up from the flimsiest
and most ambiguous of evidence as well as the most flawed
reasoning, often in order to 'get published' as soon as
possible.
Then there is the 'generation game': I remember at university how we, the
young, rejected, often with a smile or sneer, the ideas of
the older generation as being old fashioned, unscientific, not
evidence based; what we are being taught is new and everything
it should be. Now that which I was taught is being regarded
in exactly the same manner by the newly arrived generation, who
promote their own 'new' ideas, which are often not so new but
revised views of those we had rejected!
|
|
The Monumental Brass Society
is progressively working on a series of county books about, it need
hardly be added, their subject of study. These books are magnificent,
almost Victorian in their concept, as they list
every brass,
not just the very fine ones but even those very simple brasses which
often go unnoticed, such as those small rectangles of brass screwed to
the back of chairs. The books are profusely illustrated but the text is
almost in note form, which is all that is really needed. Those who conceived
this series of books and continue to compile them must be congratulated.
I regret to say that there is nothing similar about church monuments; that is to say there are no
series of volumes
which have been produced as a county series solely about church
monuments. There are certainly a number of books about church monuments
in general, some beautifully illustrated with photographs, etchings,
engravings and lithographs; there are also books about specific
monuments such as wooden tombs, alabaster tombs, military monuments,
some of these listing as many monuments as could be discovered. There
are, in fact, a few single county books but these, with one exception,
are not particularly well illustrated; the exception is Chancellor's
Essex, a massive and hefty book wonderfully illustrated with
lithographs of drawings but you will have to carry it in the boot of a
car rather than your pocket! More on this subject later.
|
|
Books Specifically About Church Monuments |
There are a number of such books and more are
appearing all the time. I will only deal with a handful here. Some are
beautifully illustrated while others have no illustrations at all, or
very few. I have presented the various books in sections more or less of
the same type
|
|
Weever's
Ancient Funerall Monuments was probably the first book to be
published solely about church monuments. John Weever (1576-1632) was an English
antiquarian whose interest in church monuments was evident in his
earlier work. He made a lengthy survey of the inscriptions on monuments
in the dioceses of Canterbury, Rochester, and Norwich. He did
not, however, make any sketches of the monuments nor did he record
heraldry or genealogy. So from those latter aspects the book is
probably not of great interest; however Weever does record
epitaphs which have since been lost. His book was published in
1631.
John Weever died the following year, 1632, and was buried in St
James, Clerkenwell. A monument was constructed to his memory
which was destroyed when the church was demolished in 1788,
despite efforts of the Society of Antiquaries whose intervention
failed to save it.
As mentioned no sketches were made of the monuments at the time
of the survey but there are eighteen woodcuts in the book, which
were probably supplied by other antiquaries at a later date for
publication. |
Gough's
Sepulchral Monuments of Great Britain. Richard Gough
(1735-1809) was
another English antiquary. His book about church monuments was a
major and thorough study and was formally titled
Sepulchral Monuments in Great Britain Applied to lustrate the
History of Families, Manners, Habits and Arts at the Different
Periods from the Norman Conquest to the Seventieth Century.
Volume I was in two parts and dealt with the first four
centuries, part I being published in 1786 and part 2 in 1796. Volume II consisted of
three
parts and dealt with the fifteenth century; they all were
published in 1796.
This work is a fine and detailed example of historical and
topographical research and contains many illustrations engravings. However Gough was not an artist so employed a
number of artists to execute the initial drawings and the
final engravings. Many of these are inaccurate and many rather
coarsely produced.
The work never did reach the seventeenth century, ending at the
fifteenth.
These books are big, measuring 1' 2" X
1' 8", and heavy. |
|
|
Rev Charles Boutell, MA.
Christian Monuments in England and Wales.
(Published by George Bell, London. 1854)
The secondary title of this book is An Historical
and Descriptive Sketch of the Various Classes of
Sepulchral Monuments which have been in Use in this
Country from about the Era of the Norman Conquest to the
Time of Edward IV.
After the massive works of Gough and Stothard,
this small book of 6⅟₂" X
9¾" and of 156 pages may come as something of
a surprise.
The book is divided into two main sections: 'I.
Stone coffins, stone coffin lids, and monumental slabs,
all of which are devoid of effigies, and, section II. Semi-effigeal monuments.' The book is very well
illustrated with many excellent drawings, which were executed by the author. In the introduction
Mr.
Boutell promises three further sections: 'III. On monumental
effigies, such as display the entire figure; IV. On altar
tombs or high tombs and monumental canopies; and
V. On head stones and other church yard memorials,
including general observations on modern monuments.'
These three sections do not appear in this book and may
have been planned for future publication; however,
nothing further did appear.
Rev
Charles Boutell (1812-1877) was an archaeologist,
antiquarian, author and clergyman who wrote books on arms and
armour and heraldry as well as on church monuments
and brasses. He illustrated many of his own works and frequently lectured on his subjects.
He was the son of Rev Charles Boutell, perpetual curate* of
Repps-with-Bastwich from1808 until 1848. Charles the Younger gained the degree of
BA at St John's College, Cambridge in 1834 and that of
MA at Trinity College, Oxford two years later. He was
briefly curate* at Hemsby, Norfolk and later at St
Leonard's, Sandridge, Norfolk from 1837-1846 where in
1839 he was ordained priest. He appears to have briefly taken two other posts before becoming Rector* of Downham Market
from 1847-1850 and from
1847-1855 Vicar* of Wiggenhall, both in Norfolk. Then in
1855 he moved to London and took a number of posts,
including Reader of Lower Norwood, Surrey from
1860-1877.
In 1845 he became one of the two secretaries of the newly formed St
Albans and Hertfordshire Architectural Society, their
first meeting being held at Sandridge. He was treasurer
for two years but unfortunately this Society reported
that 'he had the habit of publishing books financed by
the Society's funds.' He was one of the two founders
of the London and Middlesex Archaeological Society in
1855, becoming Hon Sec in 1857 but was very shortly dismissed
for 'improper book keeping' involving the sum of £56.15
which had been received in subscriptions.
A similar 'lapse' was said to have occurred in the Surrey Archaeological
Society, but I can find no direct evidence of this. In
1868 he was imprisoned for debt and later declared
bankrupt.
In his defence I should like to add that he was not a
man of independent means and any money he may have
acquired dubiously he used for the publication of his excellent
books, which he wrote and illustrated himself, to bring his
particular knowledge to the general public. His works on
heraldry were very successful and remained in
print - in revised editions - for very many years after
his death. One of these is still in print today. Other books -
including this one - are available as facsimiles (above).
* These terms will (in due course) be explained in the
glossary.
|
|
Fred H Crossley, FSA.
English Church Monuments A.D. 1150-1550.
(Published by B T Batsford, London. 1921)
The secondary title of this book is An Introduction to the Study of
Tombs and Effigies of the Medieval Period.
We - or the books now come - to a period of the twentieth century when photography had been
around for a century but had become more practical when George Eastman
invented the 'safety' roll film.†
So it is not surprising that photography would replace drawings
reproduced by photo-lithography
as the latter had replaced etching as a means of the
reproduction of images
of church monuments.
This book deals with roughly the same period as Charles Boutell's book
and is divided into three main chapters which, after a detailed
general introduction, deal with The Architectural Decoration
of Tombs and Chantry Chapel and Effigies, and Costumes. Each
chapter is then subdivided into a number of sections dealing
with such subjects as the change of style over the years of the monuments
as well as of dress
and armour, heraldry, the materials used in the construction of
monuments, contracts for monuments, associated metalwork, and
brasses.
There is useful glossary of terms but this is
unfortunately combined with
the index, a feature which never really works all that well.
The book is illustrated with a large number of excellent photographs
taken by Mr. Crossley himself and which he rightly considers more
important than increasing the amount of text at the expense of
illustrations.
Frederick Herbert Crossley (1868-1955) was a Yorkshireman but travelled
early to Cheshire to become an apprentice farmer. He later
studied at Manchester School of Art and became an instructor in
drawing, wood carving and design in Cheshire. Church
architecture became his great interest and he would travel the
country making sketches and taking photographs of his subject.
He accepted commissions for designing and actually carving church
wood work. He served on a number of committees which were
concerned with the repair,
restoration and preservation of churches.
He wrote a number of books for the publisher Batsford which
specialized
in books about topography, architecture and other non-fiction
subjects. As well as the above, his titles included English
Church Woodwork, The English Abbey and Timber Framed Buildings.
† The first roll film was introduced in 1885 on a paper
backing. In 1889 this was replaced by a plastic one, the highly
flammable nitrocellulose. The later 'safety' film simply meant
that the backing plastic no longer had this dangerous property.
|
|
Brian
Kemp PhD, D Litt, FSA English Church Monuments
(Published by B. T. Batsford Ltd, London, 1980)
This is certainly the best introduction to the subject of church
monuments. Professor Kemp writes - and also lectures - in a
clear, conscise and logical style with none of the waffle too often
associated with this subject. As the title suggests he deals with
all church monuments from the earliest Christian times to the
nineteenth century.
There are 216 pages with 176 illustrations. The book is
divided into several chapters dealing with, after an
Introduction, each of the following: 1) The Middle Ages,
2) Renaissance of the Sixteenth
and Early Seventeenth Centuries 3) The Seventeenth Century and
the Rise of the Baroque. 4) The Nineteenth Century. There is
then a chapter on Symbolism and Allegory and section on Further
Reading. There are three indices, each dealing with a separate
aspect of the subject.
Each chapter is divided into a number of subsections: for
example the chapter on the Middle Ages deals separately with
early grave slabs, monumental effigies, tomb chests and similar
related topics.
The dust cover has a brightly coloured photograph but all of
the other photographs are black and white and skillfully taken.
They were produced by the University of Reading Department of
History. This subject needs illustrations and books without any
or with few, are certainly (as Alice might say) of at least
limited use; Professor Kemp does not disappoint.
Professor Brian Richard Kemp Ph D, D Litt, FSA (1940-2019) was Professor
of History at the University of Reading. He was a long time
member of the Church Monuments Society and former President. He
was a most helpful person, always willing to answer questions,
give
advice and discuss many matters. He was also a keen natural
historian and musician.
|
Brian
Kemp PhD, D Litt, FSA Church Monuments
(Shire Publications Ltd. No. 149 First published 1985, reprinted 1997 and
2010) Softback.
This is the younger
sibling of Brian Kemp's other book on
church monuments (mentioned opposite) and one of the
Shire Library's series of excellent
pocket books on just about every subject conceivable. As we might expect
it is very well illustrated and generally well produced. There
are 32 pages and a large number of photographs.
Following an introduction there are chapters on Historical Development,
Effigies, Symbolism and the Making of Monuments. There is then a
useful section on places to visit to see a good selection of
monuments and a short bibliography.
The cover
of the latest reprint has a colour photograph but all those
inside are in black and white, a few taken by the author
himself; still, my copy cost less than £5 a few years ago.
|
Charles Alfred Stothard FSA The Monumental Effigies
of Great Britain. (For the author, by John Murray 1817 -
1832)
The twelve original planned parts were eventually bound together in book form.
This is a large book about the size of Gough mentioned above.
C. A.Stothard (1786 - 1821) was a historical draftsman, son of the
painter Thomas Stothard. He planned a twelve part work on (as
the title states) the monumental effigies of Great Britain
from the Norman Conquest until the time of Henry VIII,
although this included some in France also. The work includes
very fine etching of the effigies, sometimes with several aspects
of the effigy itself and
details, such as swords, belts etc as may
be seen in the work on the Black Prince, below. Many are coloured. There is also information
about the individual monuments and a lengthy introduction to the
work. Charles Stothard completed all of the preliminary drawings
for this work in the several churches. He
also completed the etchings for ten of planned parts but the artist met
with a fatal accident in Bere Ferris church in Devon so the
actual etchings for final two parts were carried out by other
artists, including Robert Stothard (Charles's brother), Edward
Blore, Bartholomew Howlett, and C J Smith. The final work was
edited by his wife and the introduction and additional text by
his brother-in-law Alfred John Kemp.
A second edition
with additions by and edited by John Hewitt was published in 1876.
Further information about C. A. Stothard may be found on
this page. |
George Hollis &
Thomas Hollis The Monumental Effigies of Great
Britain
George Hollis (1793-1842) & Thomas Hollis (1818-43) were father and
son who began work on what was to be a continuation of Charles
Stothard's
Monumental Effigies of Great Britain in 1839,
following the premature death of the latter. For
example, Charles Stothard never executed an etching of
Richard II and Anne of Bohemia, in Westminster Abbey,
but these are included in the Hollis collection; whether
Charles Stothard had intended to do so, or perhaps he
made the preliminary drawings only, I do not know.
George is
described as an engraver and his son, Thomas, as a
painter and draughtsman. Initially Thomas executed the
drawings while his father made the etching plates.
George died in 1842 so then Thomas continued the work
alone, executing the original drawings as well as making
the plates. Unfortunately Thomas died of
tuberculosis the
following year at the early age of twenty-five so
the work was never completed. I am afraid I have no
images or further information about the Hollis father and
son.
Their work was published in a similar form to
that of Charles Stothard but there is no accompanying text.
Initially the work was published in several parts and then these
were bound together in book form
|
|
|
|
Edward Blore
FSA Monumental Remains of Noble and Eminent
Persons comprising The Sepulchral Antiquities of Great
Britain (Harding, Lepard Co 1826)
This lengthy and curious title somewhat hides a fine collection of
engravings of church monuments.
The initial drawings in the churches were executed by
Edward Blore while the engravings were carried out by
Edward Blore himself as well as John and his younger
brother Henry le Keux. Note that these are engravings
rather than etching, the former being a more difficult
and lengthy process to execute than the latter, as is explained
elsewhere. Another difference from the Stothard and
Hollis illustrations is that there are many
engravings of the whole monuments and the surroundings
and not just, as is often the case, the effigy alone,
although these do occur as well.
The choice of monument selected seems rather arbitrary
but the arey arranged in chronological order, the first being Queen Eleanor of Castile (1290) at
Westminster Abbey, of which are
shown both the effigy alone as well as the whole
monument; the last is of Sir Anthony Browne (1548) at
Battle Abbey. There are thirty engraving in all.
Each monument is accompanied by a description of the
monument and by a biography of the person commemorated;
these were written by Rev Philip Bliss. Where
information from earlier writers is reproduced and when
there is a copy of an inscription, these are often in
Latin with no translation; however this is not frequent.
Edward Blore FRS (1787-1879) was a landscape and
architectural artist, architect and antiquary. His
background was that of an architectural draughtsman
rather than rather than architecture in which he had no
formal training, Nevertheless he was engaged in a number
of architectural projects such as the completion of
Buckingham Palace (begun by Nash) and the restoration of
Lambeth Palace.
Monumental remains was initially issued in parts, Mr. Blore
touring Britain to make the initial drawings. His other
works include the section on Winchester Cathedral for
John Britton's English Cathedrals
|
|
|
|
King Henry IV
and Joan of Navarre in Canterbury Cathedral, Kent. Here
is an example of an image of the effigies and
surrounding architecture and one of the whole monument.
Edward Blore drew both of these but the engravings were
executed by the Le Keux brother, John engraving that on
the left and Henry that above. |
|
|
County Books Specifically About Church
Monuments |
|
|
Chancellor's The
Ancient Sepulchral Monuments of Essex (1890)
(Published by Messrs Edmund Durrant Co.
Chelmsford)
Frederic Chancellor FRIBA (1825-1918) was an architect,
archaeologist, and antiquarian as well as being the first Mayor
of Chelmsford, Essex; he later served six further terms in
office. His architectural
practice was based in that town and he also had a branch office
in London . His son, Fredric Wykeham Chancellor
BA (1865-1945) later
became a partner in his father's practice. There is a building in Chelmsford designed by Frederic
Chancellor, originally intended as an art school and museum,
which is called the Frederic Chancellor Building in
his honour.
This book is very large (16" X 12" X 3½" )
and heavy, containing full descriptions of the monuments,
their position in the church, the materials of which they were
made, any inscriptions, heraldry, family histories, genealogical tables and,
most importantly, full page drawings of all of them. None of
these were actually carried out by Mr. Chancellor, although he
did visit the churches and study the monuments himself, but
were executed by a number
of artists:
John Shewell Corder, Frank Brown, Fred Oliphant,
Ernest A
Coxhead, Arthur Kent, and
F E L Harris. Sometimes J S Corder and F Brown appear to have
worked together, although the majority of the work was carried
out by John Corder alone. One is signed by F. Wykeham Chancellor, Fred's
son and two are unsigned. All of these artists were
architects (at one point Fred Oliphant adds ARIBA after his
name) so it is not surprising that the drawings have an
architectural feel about them, but they are certainly none the worse
for that; so we see plans, elevations, renderings of certain
details and examples of the lettering as well as the monument's
measurements. The printing was carried
out
by
C F Kell, photo-lithographer of London, who may well be the
rather obscure subject of the link.
Below is a drawing of a church building restoration undertaken
Mr.
Chancellor's practice and which is signed Fred Chancellor.
|
|
|
|
|
H R Mosse, MD.
The Monumental Effigies of Sussex (1250 to
1650) (Published by Comridges, Hove, Sussex. 1928)
After Fred Chancellor's massive work on the county of Essex, this little book
provides rather an extreme contrast: it measures 4¼"
X 6¾" and has 198 pages. There is only one photograph
plus four small diagrams of armour, ecclesiastical dress
and an heraldic shield. There is a very short
introduction, then a list of geographic distribution of
the effigies: listed not initially alphabetically but
divided, rather unhelpfully by archdeaconry and then
subdivided by rural deanery. This is followed by a
chronological list and then by the diagrams mentioned
above. The main text which follows is, however,
in the alphabetical order of parish.
By the term effigy is meant both sculptured figures (referred to here as
statuary) as well as incised brasses, so what is not
included are monuments that do not contain any such
representation.
The main list gives very detailed information. For each entry the name of
the dedication of the church is given and then the entry
is divided into paragraphs giving, where known, the
material of the effigy, the name of the person commemorated,
the position in the church, a detailed description of the
effigy, any heraldry, any inscription, a history of the
person commemorated, and references.
There are then two appendices: the first gives details of terms, symbols,
costume, armour, and a few other such items; the second
gives details of heraldry which had been introduced in
the main section. There is finally a general index.
Dr Herbert R Mosse MD (1858 - 1942) was presumably a hospital based physician who had a
special interest in archaeology. He was probably based
in Sussex. There is a reference to an obituary of an H R
Mosse MD in the British Medical Journal of July
11th 1942, and this may well refer to the same man.
|
|
William M
I'Anson, FSA. The Medieval Military
Effigies of Yorkshire. (The Yorkshire Archaeological
Society, Leeds. 1928)
This is a paper bound reprint of two articles that Mr. I'Anson wrote for
the Yorkshire Archaeological Society's Journal, part I appearing in Volume XXVIII in 1926 and part 2 in
Volume XXIX in 1929. The preface was written by J G
Mann, MA, BLitt, FSA in which we are told Mr. I'Anson had
intended to publish a work on the medieval effigies of
all England but this project was brought to a premature
close by a fire at
his home which sadly destroyed his library together with
all his notes and drawings. Following this tragedy Mr.
I'Anson concluded that he could
never replace the lost material so reduced the scope of
his intended work to those effigies in Yorkshire.
In the introduction Mr. I'Anson tell us that his intention is to divide the
book into six separate sections dealing with the various
types of armour which developed over the decades. I have
to mention here that there is not an exact correlation between armour and date. The author
initially describes what body armour consists of and how
it developed. There are many small drawings both on
plates and throughout the book in the main text. These are
not only of armour from Yorkshire but elsewhere (such as
the Temple Church) if this is required to illustrate the
text; the drawings are by Mr. I'Anson himself and quite
small - no more than 4" - but nevertheless more
than adequate. This is followed by Chapter one, which
contains Section I, which Mr. I'Anson calls the 'Chain
Mail and Surcoat Period'. The effigies are listed
according to their alleged date rather than their site,
which is not particularly helpful.
Part two continues with Section II which is described as 'The First
Transitional Period'. The other parts were never
completed as Mr. I'Anson sadly died before even Part 2 was
printed.
William M I'Anson FSA was a Yorkshireman who lived in Saltburn where he
was engineer in the Cleveland Water Works. He published
many articles in the Yorkshire Archaeological Journal,
many concerned with the castles of his home county. He
died before 1928.
|
|
Ida M Roper, FLS. Monumental
Effigies of Gloucestershire and Bristol. (Published
by and printed for the Author by Henry Osborne,
Gloucester 1931). Only 100 copies were published,
numbered and signed by the Author.
As the title states this book is concerned with
monumental effigies
in the county of Gloucestershire but also the somewhat
mobile city of Bristol. It includes all effigies of
persons who died before 1800. It is a small thick
book measuring 6" X 9" X 2¼", so a
bit bigger and much thicker than the original Pevsner
hard backs. The binding appears professionally executed,
but not of the mass produced variety. There are 729
pages and 40 plates, a few containing two actual photographs, in this case black and
white photographs. These were taken by a number of
photographers, mainly
Sidney Pitcher, W. Moline but some
by F H Crossley (see above), R W Dugdale and a few others. The
number photographs would probably not be considered
adequate in a similar book today.
The author writes in a no nonsense style and the layout is reminiscent of
a science text book; we shall see the reason for this
later in this short article.
The book is divided into rural deanaries,which although the smallest of
ecclesiastical geographical divisions (other than a
parish, of course) is not particularly helpful to the
majority of readers. It is then divided into civil
parishes and then churches. Each effigy is described in
its own separate section, headed by the name and date,
if known, and then there are a number of subsections,
namely, (1)Type (knight, lady, judge, abbot etc), (2)
Form (recumbent, upright etc), (3) Material, (4)
Dimensions, (5) Costume, (6) Supporters to head, (7)
Supporters to feet, (8) Description of tomb, canopy and
heraldry, (9) Inscription, (10) Remains of painting etc,
(11) Condition. (12) Position and former position(s).
(13) References. (14) General remarks. (15) Historical
notes. There is a good bibliography and index.
Ida Mary Roper (1865-1935) was the daughter of a pharmacist
and herself a botanist. She was a Fellow of The Linnean Society, the
first woman member of the Council of the Bristol and
Gloucestershire Archaeological Society, and the first woman
president of the Bristol Natural History Society. She never
married and died in 1935 being buried in the family plot in
Arnos Vale Cemetery, Bristol. |
|
|
Books on
Specific Types of Church Monuments |
|
Alfred C Fryer, PhD, FSA.
Wooden Monumental Effigies in England and
Wales (Published by Elliot Stock, London. 1924)
In the preface the author writes that he presented a paper on Wooden
Monumental Effigies to the Society of Antiquaries
in 1908 and that this was subsequently published as a
single volume with a number of photographs, the majority
of which had been taken by the author himself.
This
second edition was published fifteen years later, after
the discovery of two more such effigies; this new
edition contains all the original photographs with the
addition of twenty-one more taken by Dr Fryer and eleven
taken by Arthur Gardner which he gave permission to
use.
The book is divided into three main parts: an Introduction to the
subject; Earlier Effigies to the Black Death; and,
Revival of Wooden Effigies. There then follows a
detailed Topographical Index or glossary,
arranged by counties. Finally there is a general
index.
There are seventy-seven photographs arranged in a number of plates
distributed throughout the book.
Alfred Cooper Fryer PhD, FSA (1855 - 1937) was born in Manchester but spent his working life in Bristol. He
was a writer, chemist and archaeologist, writing many
books and articles on archaeological subjects but he also
wrote poems and children's books.
Alfred C. Fryer is not to be confused with Alfred Fryer
(1826-1912) who was a naturalist.
|
|
Harry A Tummers
Early Secular Effigies in England: The Thirteenth
Century (E. J. Brill Leiden 1980)
This is a small hardback rather attractively produced book, 6¼"
X 9½", of 196 pages and 185 plates - that is photographs - of
which there are up to three per page.
Although Dr Tummers is from the Netherlands he writes in beautiful
English and has produced a very well researched and detailed
book on 13th century secular - that is men, women and children
in civilian dress and military effigies ('knights') rather than
men (and rarely women) in various ecclesiastical dress.
The first 171 pages are written in a rather formal, academic style and
consist of several chapters: i) Preliminary Remarks, ii) The
Tomb, iii) Costume. iv) Attitude, and v) Summary and Conclusions.
In the section on attitude, Dr Tummers discusses in detail the
often misunderstood meaning of crossed legs.
There then follows a useful list of all 213 effigies of the title,
divided into three principle sections which he calls, Knightly
Effigies, Lady Effigies and Civilian Effigies. This
list is divided into several columns: Place name, Length and
State, Material, Special Features, Date, and References; this
list, so as not to be unwieldy, gives only the most important
details.
There then follows extensive notes, a bibliography and
an index, after which are the many photographs. Last of all is a
pull out map which is rather small but helpful when you transfer
to a larger scale map.
Harry Tummers is a university academic from the Netherlands and a very
affable and agreeable man. |
|
W. E. Hampton.
Memorials of the Wars of the Roses
(Published by Alan Sutton Publishing Ltd, Gloucester for
The Richard III Society, Upminster, Essex. 1979)
This books does exactly what its title says: it lists over four hundred and
fifty monuments and burial places of those associated
with the Wars of the Roses, some of which sites, as the author
states in the preface, are conjectural, although every
attempt has been made to be as accurate as possible. It then
lists in alphabetical order of county and then of
parish where these sites and monuments are
located, giving very
full information of the latter, if they still exist;
there is also good information about the commemorated, some of whom may
well be
unknown to those not familiar with this period of
history, while others will be well known to most.
There is an index of the people commemorated but I wonder if the book
should have been written in order of the commemorated
rather than the places where they are buried. There is
also a short glossary of terms and extensive
bibliography.
It is curious that this book, published for the Richard III Society, does not mention the burial place of
the King
himself, which was accurately recorded
even if his actual grave - although not his monument -
was not to be discovered for many years to come. His epitaph is
not mentioned either; this did
not survive, although a copy of it does and this is
described
here
There are a number of illustrations using photographs together with reproductions of
drawings and etchings. However some of these -
especially the photographs and the etchings of C A
Stothard - have not been reproduced well. This is
unfortunate in an otherwise 'good idea' and an
interesting book.
|
J. Charles Wall
The Tombs of the Kings of England
(Sampson Low, Marston & Company, London 1891).
Illustrated by the author.
This is very much
a Victorian book in that it is completist, rather too
much, and there is much speculation; its
style is irritatingly flowery and finally it is
dedicated to Queen Victoria herself. By kings the
author also means queens, as Good Queen Bess
gets a whole section to herself, although the Empress
Matilda does not even get a look in. By England
he means more or less the geographical area called England not
the Kingdom of England as such; so after the Union of
the Crowns under James I, Mr. Wall, although mentioning
this union, still refers to Kings of England, which is
true enough but not the whole truth..
The book is divided into a number of chapters: British (meaning before
the Anglo-Saxon dynasties), the
Anglo-Saxon kingdoms, England (here he means the
Anglo-Danish dynasties although he begins with Edward
the Elder rather than Athelstan, which would have been
more correct. However we can be thankful he does not
begin, as is often the case, with Egbert), Normans,
Plantagenets, Tudor, Stuarts, and
finally Hanoverians. We do not reach Victoria as she had
a few more years to run when the book was published.
There is much fanciful speculation in this book and quite a few errors.
The earliest kings (some of whom did not even exist) are all
given burial places but later there are drawings of
their monuments. I have to say that the drawings are of
a reasonable quality. Mr. Wall refers to the tomb in
Winchester Cathedral thought to be that of William Rufus
but now thought to be that of Bishop Henry of Blois and
writes that inside when it was opened were found parts
of the arrow that had killed him in the New Forest. At
Fontevraud Abbey he refers to one of the four effigies
to be Richard I's wife: it is his brother John's wife,
Richard's wife being buried at l'Epau Abbey, near le
Mans.
James Charles Wall FRHS
(1860-1943) was a British ecclesiologist and historian;
he wrote a number of books relating to his subject, that
described here being the first.
|
Mark Duffy The Royal Tombs of Medieval England
(Tempus 2003) Softback
It is curious that two book about similar subject should be
published a year apart. However this books only
deals
with royal tombs of the medieval period and the layout
is slightly different. By Royal Tombs, is
meant not just monarchs but members of the royal families as
well.
This itself is has a wide definition as we see the Tomb of
the Black Prince (who might have been king) and people like
Alice Chaucer, Duchess of Suffolk whose grandson made a bid
for the crown, as of Yorkist decent against HenryVII . Again it is very well
illustrated with photographs, and reproductions of etchings,
engraving, and drawings. A number of the illustrations are in
colour and the reproduction of photographs is generally
better in comparison with Dodson's book. Particular interesting are drawings of tombs that
were planned but never, for various reasons, construction;
the planned effigy of Henry VI, the least martial of kings,
curiously shows him in full armour. Medieval England
means that the book ends in the reign of Henry VII although
it begins with the Norman Conquest.
The book is divided into three principle section: 1. 1066-1307 (William I
- Henry III), 2.1307-1400 (Edward I ), 3.
1400-1509 (Henry IV-end of reign of Henry VII). Each part is
further divided into a varying number of subsections,
each slightly different. The longest subsection is that of
the tombs themselves but others include
burial location, funerary rites, tomb design, and tomb
production.
|
Mark Downing FSA Military Effigies of
England and Wales Nine volumes. (Published by the Author
2010 - )
This is a series of books that I feel we have needed for a long
time. It lists, with essential details and photographs, every
military monument ('knight') in England and Wales; this
includes all the aesthetically unappealing hulks and fragments,
and quite rightly so. The volumes are A4 size which can be
rather awkward but works well enough for the purpose. They are
not professionally bound (meaning not as by a professional book
binder); the binding - which is rather like the way an
accountant 'binds' your annual accounts - may well prove to not be as durable as this work deserves.
Should there be a fine lady with the 'knight', she is
summarily chopped off and never mentioned again, a great pity.
There are one or more counties in each volume depending on size of
the county from the standpoint of the military effigy count. There
is usually one effigy per page although there may be two pages for
this purpose if there are a number of photographs.
The monuments are listed according to county and then to parish, no rural
deaneries or archdeaconries here! For each effigy there is a
list of the following: i) location, ii) date, iii)
identification iv) position v) length and condition, vi)
heraldry v) posture vi) description, vii) references. Position
includes where in the church the effigy can actually be found, which is
very helpful as I, for one, have sometimes had the unpleasant
task of
searching behind that odious organ, or other dark and dusty
places. A grid reference in
location would have been a helpful addition. There is - for me at least - just about enough
information - concise, accurate, and brief - as I have no wish to read lengthy, wearisome speculations and baseless theories.
Following the list there is a useful - essential actually - glossary of
armour terminology; this is followed by excellent line drawings
of armour of different times with all the bits clearly labeled.
Then comes the inevitable bibliography.
The only complete book on this
subject.
Aidan Dodson The Royal Tombs of Great
Britain : An Illustrated History (Duckworth 2004)
This is a very comprehensive and well laid out book with a
large amount of illustrations, both photographs, drawings, and
plans, all, perhaps disappointingly in black and white. Some of
the photographs are frankly below standard. The drawings and
plans include those of coffins and their contents and plans of
the burial vaults.
Royal here means ruling monarch; Great Britain
means just that the whole island or parts thereof, even if the
tombs are elsewhere that Great Britain.
After a useful introduction - more of an overview - part I deals with the
several Anglo-Saxon kingdoms; many of the burial sites here are
unknown or possible. Actual monuments are few and the majority
of these are not contemporary. The mortuary chests in Winchester
Cathedral have had the names of the occupant painted several
times and the bones are now mix up. See
here for information about the mortuary chest inscribed
Edmundus Rex, which is described in this book as a son of
King Alfred.
Part II deals with England as such, beginning with this time Edgar, yet
another candidate for this role. There are many more surviving
monuments Here Matilda does get a mention and so does the
future French king Louis VIII the Lion who, when prince,
who was invited to England by the rebellious barons to replace
King John; fortunately the latter died and the barons changed
side. So does Lady Jane Grey, and Oliver and Richard Cromwell,
who were no way royal were heads of state.
Part III covers Scotland before the Union with England. The paucity of
monument in Scotland is disappointing: for example many of the
early kings were buried on Iona but you will find not a single
monument there. Finally is shown the grand monument of Mary, Queen of
Scots.
Part IV takes us to Great Britain, the two countries now having united.
The first king listed is George I, who was not buried in England
but Hanover. Here are plans and photographs of burial vaults
which the common traveller may not visit. The photographs of King
Edward VII and George V monuments shows the difficulty of
photographing white marble against a dark background.
Aidan Dodson is an Egyptologist.
|
Arthur Gardner
Alabaster Tombs of the Pre-Reformation in England.
(Cambridge University Press, 1940)
Ernest Arthur Gardner MA FSA (1878-1972)
was a writer, art historian, and photographer with a particular
interest in medieval sculpture and architecture. ( He is not to
be confused with an archaeologist of the same name, his dates
being 1862 - 1932.) Arthur Gardner graduated from Cambridge
University and joined the family firm of stockbrokers, where he
worked for forty years. This life style allowed him the time and
the income to follow his particular interests. He learned
photography from his father. He travelled Europe and the British
Isles photographing medieval sculpture and architecture. These
are being digitalize by the Courtald Institute of Arts.
This book is divided into two principal sections: text,
of 103 pages, and photographs, all black and white of
course, on a different, glossy paper, of which there are 305,
several per page. This is presumably because binding in simpler
to set the pages in this fashion, although it is less convenient
for the reader. Arthur Gardner in a very lucid writer and a
superb photographer, especially so, bearing in mind that these
photographs were presumable taken in the 1930's.
The first chapter is 'The
Alabaster Men' in which we learn what
alabaster
actually is, a useful beginning as there are basically two
types: here we are dealing with calcium phosphate dihydrate or gypsum.
Follow the links if you wish to learn about the chemistry.We
learn that alabaster is, especially in its purer from, a
beautiful, somewhat translucent, material which is rather soft
(in the resistance to abrasion sense) and easy to carve: this
latter feature is double sided as it has allowed the sculptors to produce magnificent
results but also allowed vandals and the careless to damage the
monuments. There is then a brief history of alabaster. I notice
that Mr. Gardner uses the term gablette for those
horizontal canopies surrounding the head of the effigies; there
seems to be confusion about this terms as many authors use the
term canopy, which is a vertical structure.
This is followed by a chapter on Tomb Chests and
Weepers and then one on effigies, with sections on
portraiture, symbols of rank, colour and posture. Next is a
chapter of effigy classification, which has been partly
deal within the previous chapter, dealing with them in
overlapping periods
and the form of dress worn by the effigy, both
ecclesiastical, male and female civilian and 'knights'.
Next we two
appendices: the first is a not that good drawings of
armour, which may be helpful in following the text. The second
is very useful, being a list of all the alabaster known at the
time in table form of several columns: county, class, place,
description, attribution (if known or even if not guaranteed), state
of preservation, tomb chest, special features, and reference to
the illustrations.
The author at the beginning tells us there are 342 tombs
and 507 alabaster monument, the number difference because
husband and wife often share the same tomb chest but have
individual effigies. He admits there may be a few more which
have escaped his notice.
An excellent book, not pocket size but not car boot
size either: carry it in your camera bag
|
|
|
General Books
Which are, nevertheless, an
excellent source of information about church monuments |
|
The Royal Commission
of Historical Monuments of England
Scotland
and Wales |
Governments are not noted for their foresight,
ability to learn from the
past, or the understanding of all the ramifications of what they are about to
do. They are the very people who should be capable of this, of course,
but their actions, as we have seen only too often, can lead to chaos and even
disaster. But occasionally, although unintentionally, their actions can
lead to the proverbial 'good thing'. One of these good things was the
birth of the Royal Commission of Historical Monuments of England
(hereafter RCHM (Eng)). This is how it happened.
In 1882 the government passed the laudable
Ancient Monuments Protection Act and
this was followed by the even more laudable and wider ranging
Ancient Monuments Protection Act of 1900. All very commendable,
of course, and the
government had the best of intentions in passing these acts but, as
is often
the case, the government had not actually thought it through.
The problem was that no one had identified quite which ancient
or historic monuments should be covered by this protection
legislation because the government had not thought about that
simple but important
point. This
was pointed out by David Murray in Archaeological Survey of the
United Kingdom (1896) and a little later by Gerard Baldwin Brown (right) in
Care of Ancient Monuments (1905). Brown stated what should have
been obvious, although clearly had not been so to the government, and that
was in order for
the legislation to be effective a detailed list of monuments needed to
be compiled. The Learned Societies (such as the British Archaeological
Association) also lobbied for action to be taken. Gerard Brown proposed
that the issues should be addressed by a Royal Commission.
A Royal Commission is an ad-hoc formal public enquiry.
It has powers much greater than those of a judge but which are
restricted to the terms of reference. It is created by the Head of State
(in Britain, the Monarch) on the advice of the government and
formally appointed by letters patent. Once begun a Royal Commission
cannot be stopped by the government.
Gerard Baldwin Brown's and the Learned Societies'
proposal did not go unheeded and a Royal Commission was granted by Royal
Warrant in 1908. In that year the Royal Commission of Ancient and
Historical Monuments of Scotland, the Royal Commission of the Ancient and
Historical Monuments of Wales and finally the Royal Commission of the
Historical Monuments of England were all established with a short
interval between the three. Thus the Commission covered
Britain but not the United Kingdom. The commissioners were appointed by
the various learned societies and other interested bodies and
individuals. So the RCHM (England) was born in 1908.
Cut-off dates were set for what was to be recorded: the
start date was 'the earliest times', not a limit at all really,
but what was the finish date to be? Initially this was set at
1700, a nice round figure, but a later warrant of 1913 reset this this
limit to fourteen years later at somewhat awkward date of 1714, the date
of the death of Queen Anne, that is, the end of the Stuart dynasty. Of
course all dates are quite arbitrary so none can be correct and a later
warrant of 1946 gave the Commissioners discretion to go beyond 1714 but with a discretionary
terminal date of 1850, a century and a half
later than the initial set date. As it was to turn out only one complete
county (Dorset) and two towns (Stamford and Cambridge) were to benefit
from this later date.
The work started well with the publication of the
very first inventory in 1910: this was Hertfordshire (left)
and was contained in a single volume. And what a work it
proved to be! The work began as
it was to continue for the next ninety odd years with some variations.
Hertfordshire contains St Albans Cathedral: the RCHM would, with a few
exceptions, tend to avoid cathedrals in the future.
The individual volumes
were, until the
final days, hardbacks measuring 10¾"
X 8¼" and bound in gray or red cloth. The
inventories were to be published county by county; for some counties
(like the very first Hertfordshire) the
inventories occupied single volumes but for others, especially when
the cut-off date was extended, they occupied more than one, and some of the volumes were
even published in several parts. Each separate
volume was concerned with an arbitrary geographical region rather
than following the previous one alphabetically so that, unless your geography was
first rate, finding an individual village or town could be a little
difficult. However it did ensure that the volumes
appeared at regular intervals rather than waiting for the whole county to
be have been surveyed.
Each book followed a similar pattern. Inside the back cover a flap
housed a folded coloured map of the
area covered of the relevant county and beautiful coloured folded plans
of any cathedral or large building that was being described in
the text. There are then several introductory sections,
which always followed the same form, before the actual inventory began:
i) A list of plans and illustrations.
ii) A short preface. iii) Material
related to the Royal Commission. This included a list of those monuments
deemed 'especially worthy of preservation.' iv) Sectional Preface, this
was an overview of what was to follow in the inventory.
v) A large (about 70 plus plates) section composed entirely of photographs
arranged according to monument type. v) A list of hundreds and parishes
of the whole county; those which were in that particular volume were italized. vi) Then the inventory itself, by far the largest section of
course. This will be dealt with below. vii) A short
list of relevant heraldry viii) A well produced
glossary of terms, and finally, ix) The index. This was not sectional.
The inventory proper was arranged in
alphabetical order of the individual parishes. Each individual parish,
following a general introduction, was then divided into
several individual sections, some of which might not always be
applicable: these were a) Prehistoric monuments and earthworks. b) Roman
monuments and Roman Earthworks. c)
English ecclesiastical monuments. d) English secular
monuments. e) Unclassified monuments. These sections were further divided
into subsections, for example, a church would be divided thus: a)
A general introduction. b) The architecture of each part of the building
described separately. c) The fittings which were further divided
alphabetically into: Bells, Brackets, Brasses and indents,
Chairs, Coffin lids or slabs, Communion Table, Doors, Font, Glass,
Monuments and floor slabs; not all of these would be present, of
course, and there may well be others as the situation required. This was strictly logical but it might be found slightly irritating that
church monuments appeared in three different subsections; however if you
keep this in mind there is not insurmountable.
The great beauty of these RCHM books were the excellent
and large amount of illustrations. There were many photographs, all of a
remarkably good quality bearing in mind some of these books are now more
than a century old, which occurred, apart from those mentioned above,
scattered throughout the book in batches of plates. Then there were
drawings, maps (some pull out), plans of the buildings and streets,
diagrams all scattered throughout the pages. This was quite the right
approach: reading descriptions of a church monument (or anything else
for that matter) can eventually become tedious and produce an inaccurate
picture in your mind. After all, 'what use is a book without pictures?'
The next county to appear was Buckinghamshire which
was published in two volumes, North, and South; these were published
1912-1913. Essex was next and this appeared in in four
volumes, North-West, Central & South-West, North-East, and
South East. These appeared 1916-1923, there being no pause
during World War I. This was a major work with everything
proceeding according to plan. Essex was followed by an even more ambitious work when
London was published 1924-1930 in five volumes. One volume
was devoted to Westminster Abbey alone while St Paul's Cathedral appeared in the
volume devoted to the City. The one volume covering Huntingdonshire seemed
to sneak in during 1926 in the midst of the publication of the London volumes.
Huntingdonshire no longer exists at the time of writing but may make a
come back one of these days. This volume did not contain the elusive
Soke of Peterborough with Peterborough Cathedral. Herefordshire came next and this was published
in three volumes between 1931-1934. This work contained Hereford
Cathedral. The work was still proceeding very well and according to plan;
you might have felt you would have to wait more than a life time to see
the work completed but better that than a rushed and thus inaccurate and
incomplete work.
In 1936 Westmoreland was published in one
volume. Westmoreland also no longer exists being combined with Cumberland
(with Carlisle Cathedral) in the 1970's to produce Cumbria. Cumberland
was never published. The next volume to be published
was Middlesex in 1937. Middlesex was absorbed by neighbouring
counties in 1965. They still have a cricket team and remember Denis
Compton, however. Following this the RCHM changed their approach
somewhat and published The City of Oxford in 1939 as a separate
volume; this included Christ Church Cathedral. The County of Oxfordshire
was never published. I have no idea how the counties which were to be
selected for survey were selected but curiously they were often ones
that disappeared during local government reorganization.
Work on the inventories ended with the outbreak of World
War II and the RCHM was, understandably, to remain silent for several
years after the war.
Then they returned with what seemed like a new
confidence and certainly with a flourish. Everything was now as it
was before (but even better) and as it should have been. The
county inventories continued with Dorset which began in 1952 and was not
completed until 1975. Dorset was contained in five volumes, one of which
had two and another three parts. This is a magnificent work and
certainly their magnum opus. On the shelf the width of all the
volumes is a little over 11 inches. A county with no
cathedral, of course. These were the first of the RCHM volumes that
I bought and they were quite reasonably priced at the time. But was this
the beginning of the end of these inventories?
We had become accustomed to complete counties arriving at
regular intervals but Dorset proved to be the last to do so. From now on counties
were begun but never completed and then eventually the volumes published were no
longer in the form of the familiar inventories. The prices increased
considerably and I was told by the local bookseller, from whom I bought
the volumes, that this was because the government had removed the
generous subsidies which had lowered the real cost of these books
considerably.
During the work on the Dorset volumes The City of
Cambridge appeared in 1959. This was published in two volumes and
there was also a box of maps to accompany the books. Again
during the Dorset publications two volumes covering parts of the County
of Cambridgeshire was published 1968 - 1972. Cambridgeshire was
never completed so we were never unsurprisingly to see an inventory of Ely Cathedral.
Another massive work was begun again during the
work on Dorset. This was The City of York which was
begun in 1962 and completed, well it was never completed; the last volume
- Volume Five: The Central Area - was published in 1981. I was living
near York at this time and I remember buying Volume Five from a bookshop
in Petersgate. I - and almost certainly many others - eagerly awaited
the next volume, Volume Six, which would certainly cover the Minster.
What did happen is described below.
When the last of the Dorset volumes was
published in 1975 the RCHM moved on to Northamptonshire and published
several volumes, the last appearing in 1986. However the RCHM seemed
somehow to have lost its way as Volume I concerned the
Archaeological Sites in North-East Northamptonshire. Volume II was
about those in Central Northamptonshire, Vol III in
North-West Northamptonshire and Volume IV in South-West
Northamptonshire. What on earth was actually going on here? These
volumes must surely have been of considerably less appeal than
the previous superb inventories and this is borne out by the fact that
you can still buy these volumes quite new and in their original unopened
box from second hand book
dealers. Did someone in authority perhaps
deliberately plan these books knowing that they would sell poorly
and then announce, with some truth, that the project was losing money so
that the RCHM could be justifiably be wound down? Then the RCHM changed its
way again: Volume V was Archaeological Sites and Churches in
Northampton but this was, for the first time, a paperback volume and,
although the churches were listed and described, with the usual
drawings, plans and photographs as before, the actual inventories appear
on three microfiche sheets in the back pocket with the maps.
Unfortunately I have never been able to examine these. Was this volume
destined for libraries where there are microfiche readers? If so a
paperback binding is really not robust enough for this purpose. In the
introduction to this volume it is explained that the book appeared is
this form, meaning paperback and microfiche, because of the high cost of hard
back book
production to the very high standard with
which we had become familiar.
More paperbacks were to follow but we can be thankful that this was the
first and last venture into microfiche. But then in 1985 a RCHM book in the style with which we
were familiar arrived: this was
Northamptonshire Vol VI: the Architectural Monuments of North
Northamptonshire. Not quite as of old: all of the photographs were gathered at the end of the volume rather than some being at the
beginning with many scattered through the book, and there was no pocket at
the back full of maps and plans. Never mind: they're back! Unfortunately
no more volumes appeared.
In 1976 during the production of the Northamptonshire volumes the
first - and, as it turned out, the last - of the Gloucestershire
Volumes was published: Volume I: Iron Age and Romano-British Monuments in
the Gloucestershire Cotswolds. But we never saw any further
volumes.
At the same date there were published two town/city inventories: An
Inventory of the Historical Monuments in the Town of
Stamford, and
Ancient and Historical Monuments in the City of Salisbury
Volume I.
This latter covered
the area of the former municipal borough, exclusive of the cathedral
close and its walls and gates, but included Old Sarum castle and
cathedral, but not Salisbury Cathedral as was anticipated.
And that was that according to the Google list of
counties covered by the RCHM ...although not quite as more were to follow.
Many including myself must have been eagerly awaiting City of York
- Volume VI: The Minster. In 1985 there appeared
Excavations
at York Minster Volume II, followed in 1995 by Volume I.
This latter was a very fine publication indeed, consisting of two
separate parts in a slipcase. It was also a whopping £100.00! These were
all of interest and beautifully produced by the RCHM so we eagerly awaited the
inventory volume. It never appeared: instead York Minster: An
Architectural History 1220-1500 was published in 2003
no longer by the RCHM but by English Heritage, which had swallowed up
the former organization in 1999. An excellent book with
superb photographs and drawings, but, sorry I'm afraid this is not what
we had been waiting for and just would not do. Volume VI had been in preparation it appears
but was never completed.
Wiltshire did not fare well itself but far better than Hampshire, and many other
counties, cities, towns and villages, which did not fare at all. I mention Hampshire because I was
looking forward to a possible Winchester Cathedral inventory. In 1987
was published a stand alone paperback: Churches of South-East
Wiltshire. This was very much in the high standard of the RCHM with
superb photographs, drawings, plans, and maps but was not an inventory
at all. However the churches were listed and described
individually. In the same year was published another Salisbury volume:
Salisbury: the Houses in the Close. Again this was a paperback
and again the illustrations were of the highest standard. It was
followed by Salisbury Cathedral. Perspectives of the Architectural
History in 1996; again a paperback and again very well produced:
there was even a folded plan of the cathedral in an attempt at a pocket
attached inside the rear cover. But worse was to come: in 1999 appeared
Sumptuous and Adorn'd: the Decorations of Salsbury Cathedral.
Now, apart from the layout following the unsatisfactory thematic form,
even the title was quite unsatisfactory too: no longer Salisbury Vol
Something. And there was not
even a folded map in a pocket: you had to buy the earlier volume for
that.
That was the end of those wonderful inventories,
their maps, building plans, and photographs. End of an era!
Unfortunately there was not even
a Friends of the RCHM to protest.
|
|
Nikolas Pevsner
The Pevsner Architectural Guides |
These are the books that everyone (or nearly everyone) knows, some
people carry around, others even quote from , and if they
follow the precedent set by Aldous Huxley in Brave New World, may
even swear by. However personally I am more likely to swear at!
The history of the Pevsner Guides
is a very different one from that of the RCHM. Sir Nikolaus Pevsner came
to Britain as a refugee from Germany in 1930; he was once referred to as
a 'Pedantic Prussian' by no less then John Betjeman, who, it is
said, was later to
write a scathing article about the Pevsner volume on County Durham, referring
to the numerous errors and omissions in that volume. Pevsner, it is
reported, found that in Britain, unlike other European countries,
had little or no information about local architecture, especially for
travellers. (Is this actually true? It would seem not to be the case in
France, at least, and, in fact, the publishers of the Pevsner volumes
replied to me, when I asked that if there were a similar equivalent
series in France, that there was not. But see the
section on France below.) He must also have been aware of the very
comprehensive RCHM volumes which began publication in 1910 (see
above) but these are large, heavy volumes (although not academic
tomes) and certainly not intended as pocket sized guides. He gained the
backing of Allan Lane of Penguin Books, for whom he had written a work
earlier, and work began on the Pevsner Guides in 1945. Lane employed two
part time assistants (both German refugees) who prepared notes from
published sources. Pevsner himself spent his academic holidays touring
the country making personal observations.
The first 'Pevsner' appeared in 1951 and this was about the
buildings of Cornwall. It is interesting to note that John Betjeman had
begun the Shell Guides, sponsored by the oil company and aimed
at the up and coming breed of travelling motorists, with Cornwall in 1934.
Each county volume begins with a foreword, and this is then
followed by a lengthy introduction which deals with, in
separate sections: general, geology and topography, building
materials, early architecture, medieval architecture and
sculptures, fortified buildings, architecture 1550-1800, small domestic
buildings, the 18th-20th centuries including transport and industries,
and 19th and 20th century architecture. There is variation
on this general arrangement as the situation requires. You will find
church monuments alluded to in the relevant sections which avoids having
to trawl through the lengthy topographical sections; this is just a
rough guide but still very useful.
The Pevsner volumes are very well laid out indeed and the
largest section - what we might call the topographical section - is
excellent and never descends into thematic mode, as has been done necessarily in the
sections of the introduction. The section is
arranged alphabetically according to parish which then lists
separately the various buildings of interest in that parish. Some
parishes have an introduction, where relevant, of varying length. In the
larger towns the
building list is followed by a perambulations sections (with
a clearly drawn map) so you can wander round the town, Pevsner
in hand and see for yourself the buildings (in the most general sense of
the word) that he describes, as well as showing the world that you are
not just a tourist in the most negative sense of that word.
Following the topographical section is a thorough glossary of terms
with helpful diagrams, and then a number of separate indices
for places, artists etc.
The Pevsner volumes are therefore especially useful for
the church monument hunter, being by far the best books to discover the
sites of nearly all the church monuments in the British Isles. The
simple slabs or tablets, which might have been of no interest to some
but, nevertheless, may be of great interest to others are not, of
course, included; in fact it would be quite unfair to consider this a
serious omission in books of this size. The RCHM series would have been
the best source of all - allowing for the cut-off dates - but these were
not - and will never now be - completed. As mentioned above each entry
for a parish there is a quite distinct church (or
occasionally a churches) section and this is further
divided into further subsections for general architectural overview,
woodwork, stained glass, monuments etc. Note
that, unlike the RCHM volumes there is one section for all types of
church monuments. Occasionally - but I am glad to say very rarely - a monument is
described, presumably because the author considers it 'of importance'
(as art historians are wont to say), in the main section rather
than later in the monuments list.
Unfortunately, at least in my opinion, these volumes have their
faults: as John Betjeman once commented the work has too many errors and
omissions. You will find example of the former scattered about
the pages of this web site and just one example of an omission is as
follows: on the east wall of the south aisle of the crypt of St Paul's
Cathedral are three wall monuments all together, being to Mary Wren,
Edmund Wiseman, and William Blake. I doubt if many people will know of
the first two (I didn't) but many will be familiar with the latter (I
was) and even more
his poem, And Did Those Feet in Ancient Time. But Pevsner includes
only the former two, as to him being more 'important'. Another
type of omission seen from time to time is to label a monument, for
example, as Gen Ross, without even an initial
or a date of death; this may well show carelessness, failure to check
details, or that the proof reading is quite inadequate. I get the
impression that these volumes were somewhat rushed to publication. I am
sure that these errors and omissions will be corrected in due course in
later editions but I do find the frequency of them unsatisfactory in what has become a
standard work.
While agreeing that the Pevsner series is a fine achievement and very
well organized, I dislike the style of the writing in these volumes. The
descriptions are far, far too subjective, at times bordering on being
arrogantly opinionated and even somewhat offensive. For example we see
words such as 'ghastly', 'comic' or 'foolish'; is this really
needed in such books? In Canterbury the gilt-bronze effigy of the
Black Prince (as all military monuments of that time) is referred to as
'stiff' (hardly surprising with armour of the period!) but nothing about the amazing skill of the medieval craftsmen; while in
Ewelm Alice Chaucer, Duchess
of Suffolk, is referred to as 'looking like a horse'; very droll, of
course. What I found particularly irritating when I visited Hereford
was the petulant rant about the series of bishops' effigies in Hereford
Cathedral: Pevsner may not approve but they are of curious interest and
often photographed so obviously some people do find them worthwhile. What is required is an
objective list and description of what is being referred to and not one
man's unchallenged opinion. Where other writers have taken up the work the
style remains unchanged, although the later editions are improving..
Other failures of style I find disagreeable would appear to be a
lapse of good manners or even frank rudeness .One which is seen from
time to time is this:...tablets by J. Joplin, 1822,
and G. Green, 1837 as if the commemorated were of no
importance. These books were designed as popular guides to the
buildings of England not as an art historian's companion. I feel
sure that the majority of people would rather read the names of the
commemorated, which are often difficult to decipher owing to fading of
the inscription or the height of the monument, rather than a sculptor or
mason with whom they are probably quite unfamiliar. Another, which is
seen very
frequently is this: ...Sir Robert Throckmorton and wife ...,
that is not even his Wife, as if his wife were of so little importance or regard that her
name is not worth mentioning.
These failings may be forgivable in an inexpensive, popular guide books
but Pevsners are not such books: they academic books which
have been edited and proof read but not all that thoroughly, it
seems.
The Pevsners are being extensively revised by others and many are
in the second and a number in their third editions. I hope these
criticisms - including the poor manners - will be corrected. For now
I have to say that the Buildings of..... is an excellent series
but I wish someone else had written it.
|
France |
In contrast to Britain there is no similar series of books in France which list church monuments clearly and concisely as do the RCHM and
Pevsner series. I once contacted the Pevsner publishers to ask
if there were such books but was told that there was not.
|
Hachette's Le Guide de Patrimoine. In the 1990's the
publisher Hachette began to publish a series of books on the cultural
heritage of France; only four, as far as I can tell, were actually
published and then the series
simply appeared to fade away. The aim appeared
to be to produce a series of books similar to the Pevsner
series which itself aimed to - and will eventually - cover the whole of the British Isles, and, in fact, the
Hachette books
were the same size and shape as the later 'elongated' Pevsner volumes.
They appear to have been planned to be published as one volume per
French region, that is the original regions, but only Centre, Isle de
France, Languedoc-Rousillon, and Champagne Ardenne were actually published. Regions are big and were created in 1956, each regions consisting of a
varying number of departments which are, more or less, equivalent to but
generally much bigger than the British counties: for example the
department Pays de la Loire consists of five actual departments. This was
not such a massive undertaking as it would seem at first glance: the
Pevsner volumes list all buildings of note and their contents where
as the Hatchette volumes are concerned only with buildings of
historical interest.
The Hatchette volumes are beautifully illustrated. There are
photographs, and reproductions of drawings, etchings and engraving as well
as many maps, plans and diagrams, all within the text. In fact the
series is a visual delight!
However when it comes to the subject of church monuments the Hachette
volumes are totally inadequate: church monuments rarely receive a
mention at all and when they do it is a brief one in the general
text rather than a short separate section. For example, in the Centre
volume the lovely monument of Agnès Sorrell at
Loches receives little more than a mention and no drawing or photograph
at all.
These books are not an adequate source to hunt for church monuments and
certainly vastly inferior to the Pevsner volumes in this
regard.
|
Dictionnaire des Eglises de France. (Éditions
Robert Laffont , 1966)
This is a massive multi-volume work- almost Victorian in concept -
undertaken in the 1960's. There are sixteen volumes covering the
whole of France - plus, for good measure, Belgium, Luxenbourg, and
Switzerland - as well as a separate introductory volume. Altogether
there are 10,000 churches included with 7,000 illustrations. This latter
consist of black and white photographs, with a few full pages in full colour, plans, and reproductions of engravings, etchings, and
drawings. Each volume measures 8½" X 11" and the
length of the whole work measured along a shelf is massive 1' 4".
There are about 200 pages per volume. Each volume has a large and
excellent folded map in a pocket in the back, rather like those the RCHM
used to provide.
This is a magnificent work on the subject but actually finding the church
you are looking for might present a problem. The books were written before
the French government introduced the régions which when
sub-divided into their separate départements made the
individual communes and their churches very easy to find. The
volume shown is titled Auvergne, Limousin, Bourbonnais;
the first two were former régions but are no longer individual régions
while the latter was a province and never a région at all. To make it
even more difficult the volume is not divided into sections
corresponding to the three units (for want of a better word) of the
title but is an alphabetical list of all the départements in
these combined 'units'. However after the main heading of
each commune there is bracketed the
départment of which that commune is situated. All of which means you
will have to do some cross referencing from time to time.
After each commune is listed the names of the church or churches
it contains. However this is not divided into subsections as Pevsner
and the RCHM, which makes any monument difficult to find.
Skimming through the text of 8½" X 11" of
book to find a monument is no easy task, especially when one's French
is, at the best, described as basic. Monuments are not particularly well featured but, to date, this is the
best series of books to find them.
|
more to follow |
<Top of Page>
<Home - Index - Page> |
|